I'm trying to get my head around when middle names were introduced to England. By a middle name, I mean a second given name chosen by the parents rather than a nickname added later or a second name that acted as an additional surname or a name that was added when the person was not an infant (such as a confirmation name).
In general, it seems that giving a child two middle names was popularised by the Hanoverians - both of George I's children had two given names (George Augustus and Sophia Dorothea) as did George I himself and his wife. Double naming seems to have been very common in the German states and is something that should be looked into to see when it started.
In the wider population, the practice does not seem to have caught on widely until the mid-nineteenth century with a few notable exceptions (Mary Anne). By the end of the nineteenth century, it was becoming uncommon to lack a middle name.
Prior to the Hanoverians, giving a middle name seems to be an unusual practice. So far, my study has been limited to the aristocracy but I will update this post when I find more examples.
The earliest example I can find is Henry Frederick Stuart, the son of James I of England and IV of Scotland, and Anne of Denmark. He was born in 1594 in Scotland - so not strictly an English example, but he was the heir to the English (and Scottish) throne until 1612.
The earliest example of a child born in England is Charles I's eldest son, Charles James, who was born in 1629 and died on the day of his birth. Two of Charles I's other children had two names: Mary Henrietta (b. 1631, the mother of the future William III) and Henrietta Anne (b. 1644). Their mother Henrietta Maria, a French princess, also had a middle name. Middle names seem to arrive in France earlier (several of Henri II's children, born in the 1540s and 1550s had middle names).
Henry Algernon Percy, 5th Earl of Northumberland (1477-1527) and his son, Henry Algernon Percy, 6th Earl of Northumberland (1502-37)
Frances Anne Hastings (b. 1533) - daughter of the 2nd Earl of Huntingdon, mother of the William Compton, 1st Earl of Northampton. None of her siblings had middle names.
Henry Frederick Howard, 22nd Earl of Arundel (b.1608) - Anne of Denmark was his godmother, none of his siblings or his own children had middle names.
Henrietta Marie Feilding - (b. 1610s or 20s) daughter of William Feilding, 1st Earl of Denbigh. Died young.
Edmund Berry Godfrey (1621-78) - named after his two godfathers - Edmund Harrison and John Berrie.
Vere Essex Cromwell, 4th Earl of Ardglass (1625-1687)
Anne Sophia Herbert (d. 1643) - daughter of the Earl of Pembroke, wife of the 1st Earl of Carnarvon
John Thomas Woolhouse (1666-1734) - oculist
William George Richard Stanley , 9th Earl of Derby (1655-1702), his mother, Dorothea Helena Kirkhoven, was Dutch
Susannah Penelope Gibson (c.1655-1700) - daughter of miniature painter and court dwarf Richard Gibson
Henrietta Maria Wentworth (1660-1686)
Erasmus Henry Dryden (1669-1710)
Barnaby Bernard Lintot (1675-1736) - bookseller and publisher
Benedict Leonard Calvert, 4th Baron Baltimore (1679-1715)
Thomas John Francis Strickland (c.1682-1740) - Bishop of Namur, his mother was James Francis Edward Stuart's under-governess
Mannock John Strickland (1683-1744) - counsellor and lawyer. His father Robert was the vice-chamberlain and chancellor to Mary of Modena.
William Richard Chetwynd, 3rd Viscount Chetwynd (1684-1770)
Mary Anne Campion (c.1687-1706) - dancer and singer, mistress of the first Duke of Devonshire
Joseph Edward Gage (c.1687-1766) - adventurer
Anna Maria Garthwaite (1688-1763) - textile designer
James Francis Edward Stuart (1688-1766) - son of the deposed King James II, the 'Old Pretender'. His sister, born in France, was Louisa Maria Teresa.
Paul Daniel Crespin (1693/4-1770) - goldsmith, son of Huguenot Daniel Crespin
James Edward Oglethorpe (1696-1785) - founder of Georgia. His parents were prominent Jacobites, and several of his sisters had middle names: Anne Henrietta (1683-1756), Luisa Mary (b. 1693) and Frances Charlotte (b.1695).
Henrietta Louisa Fermor (1698-1761) - countess of Pomfret
I wonder if the lack of royal Tudor children in England for over fifty years had anything to do with the later arrival of middle names and the lack of opportunity to import naming customs from a continental spouse.
Anyway, I just wanted to record my research so far and set down some musings. I intend to update this post if/when I find more instances of early middle names.
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Early Examples of Middle Naming in England
Posted by Sarah Francis at 6:14 pm 0 comments
Saturday, July 27, 2013
Royal Namers: Traditionalists, Trendsetters and Trailblazers
So the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have had a baby boy and named it George Alexander Louis. The name that was expected and, indeed, if you started working out all the possibilities - the only so-called 'royal' name that was really viable.
I wanted to see how their royal predecessors' name choice affected the popularity of the name. Are royal names copied? But for the recent generations of royals, the BBC got there first. Their graph is perfectly adequate and going from my title, it seems that Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip were traditionalists, and Prince Charles and Princess Diana were trendsetters. By that, I mean that the names chosen by Elizabeth and Philip were already fairly popular when chosen by them, and did not increase substantially in popularity, despite being given the seal of approval. William and Henry - or Harry - however, grew in popularity following their births. You could say that Charles and Diana tapped into the zeitgeist of the age, or that they did set a trend.
To me, it seems clear that baby Prince George has a name that is traditional. It is yet to be seen whether the choice will be a trendsetter - it has risen in rank over the past ten years but decreased in the actual percentage of people who bear the name (see the ONS's Name Comparison tool and Anna Powell-Smith's England and Wales Baby Names visualisation site). If anything, at the moment, the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge seem to be trend-followers rather than trendsetters.
So the modern royals are traditionalists and trendsetters. How about Queen Victoria? I'd like to suggest that she was both, and a trailblazer as well.
I talk about where my data comes from at the end of the post.
Queen Victoria the Traditionalist
Data
My data was gathered in the same method as my Victorian Smiths study, using FreeBMD to find out how many people with NAME X Smith (eg Victoria Smith) were born every five years from 1840 to 1910. In a new development for me, I then worked out how many Smiths in total were born for each five year period. From this, I worked out the percentage of, for example, Victorias born for each period. For example, 5 Victoria Smiths were born in Jan 1840-Dec 1844, out of 40783 Smiths total for that period, so 0.01% of children were named Victoria.
In the case of Victoria, Helena, Louise and Leopold, the numbers of children born with those names were very small. Please look at the scales at the side of the graphs.
Posted by Sarah Francis at 3:30 pm 0 comments
Sunday, April 28, 2013
Research Sunday: Age Distribution among the Names of the 1881 Women of St Ives
It's a somewhat convoluted title, but it touches upon two areas that I have been thinking about since my last post on workhouse names. First, can regionality be seen in the names given in the 1881 census, and secondly, can you see if names skew 'older' or 'younger'. In 1881, was Jane a name associated with old people or young people?
I'm going to address regionality first. With modern data, it can be easy to compare naming trends in different countries, and now, there is more information within countries about modern regional naming patterns. Baby Name Wizard has the excellent Name Mapper for US data, there used to be a good Baby Name Map but it doesn't seem to be online anymore. England and Wales now releases top 10s for each region; in Canada and Australia, the different states/territories/provinces release their own name data each year.
The 1881 census recorded where people lived and where they were born, so it's possible to take a snapshot of which names were much more popular in certain regions than others.
Some regions retain strong identities and names that are strongly linked with those regions - I've started with Cornwall. You can buy whole books about 'Cornish Names' - I wanted to find out whether any of those names was actually being used in Cornwall in 1881. I chose St Ives, and ordered the names from this page. It gave me 1615 names in total, 897 females and 718 males. There's plenty in these lists to discuss, so I'm dividing these posts into male and female to do so.
Without further ado, here are the 20 most popular female names:
Rank | Name | Count | % | Change from general population data | Change in % from general population data |
1 | Mary | 165 | 18.39 | = | +5.3% |
2 | Elizabeth | 127 | 14.16 | = | +5.8% |
3 | Jane | 48 | 5.35 | +2 | +6.2% |
4 | Catherine | 40 | 4.46 | +13 | +3.3% |
5 | Ann | 32 | 3.57 | -2 | -2.9% |
6 | Grace | 27 | 3.01 | +44 | +2.7% |
7 | Annie | 26 | 2.90 | +2 | +0.2% |
8 | Eliza | 24 | 2.68 | -1 | -0.1% |
9 | Sarah | 23 | 2.56 | -5 | -3.7% |
10 | Margaret | 21 | 2.34 | +1 | = |
11 | Martha | 19 | 2.12 | +3 | +0.5% |
12 | Alice | 17 | 1.90 | -4 | -0.9% |
13 | Nanny | 17 | 1.90 | NEW | NEW |
14 | Bessie | 14 | 1.56 | +49 | +1.4% |
15 | Susan | 12 | 1.34 | +16 | +0.7% |
16 | Kate | 11 | 1.23 | +10 | +0.4% |
17 | Edith | 9 | 1.00 | +2 | = |
18 | Nancy | 9 | 1.00 | +51 | +0.9% |
19 | Wilmot | 9 | 1.00 | NEW | NEW |
20 | Emma | 8 | 0.89 | -10 | -1.8% |
I'll start with the percentage data. 73.36% of the women in the St Ives sample held a name in the top 20, this is a little higher than the national average of 67.9%, but not as high as 78.8% of last week's workhouse names. So the women in St Ives were a little more uniform in their naming habits than the general population. The top 10 in St Ives is 59.4%, higher than the general population's 53%.
Regionality is clear in this list. Aside from the top few names, there are seven new names to the top 20 compared with the general population, including two (Nanny and Wilmot) which were not in the top 100 at all. Now this is a small sample, so I did consider whether Nanny and Wilmot in particular represented a family naming pattern. The same surnames were repeated frequently - it seems to have been a close knit community. However, they were from families with different surnames, and spanned ages from 67 to 4 for Wilmot and 75 to 2 for Nanny, with them fairly well distributed among the ages.
Looking at the FreeBMD records, Wilmot (a diminutive of William, could be borne by men or women) was given to 1607 people (no distinction between men and women) between 1837 and 1960 (though I think the records are patchy after about 1920). Of those 1607 people, 294 were born in Cornwall - 18.2% of Wilmots. In an average year (1850), Cornwall counted for 2.2% of the births recorded on FreeBMD, so 18.2% is a massive increase. I suspect that Wilmot as a female name (as it appears exclusively in St Ives) would give an even higher %, but FreeBMD doesn't differentiate between male and female records.
1109 Nannys were born in Cornwall, 28.4% of the Nannys born in Britain. Nancy and Annie also show considerable increases. Nans is a Cornish word that means 'valley', but I don't think there's a link between the names and the word. The Oxford English Dictionary first lists Nanny appearing with its nursemaid meaning at the end of the 18th century, nanny-goat appears in the mid 18th century.
Age Distribution
In my last post, I commented that there seemed to be a lot of 'older' names that were more popular amongst the workhouse women, probably because the age of the workhouse women tended to be older. In the past week, I've realised that I can depict the age distribution of the St Ives women, and compare whether different names have different age distributions. So to start, here is a graph:
Nearly half (411) of the women were under 20 years old (born after 1861), so 'young' names should dominate. From my Victorian Smiths posts, I've identified four names to test: Jane (which should be on 40+ year olds), Mary (should be on all ages, but mainly 20 year olds), Annie (which should be on 0 year olds) and Grace (which I didn't look at when I did my Victorian Smiths study - as you can see by its climb of 44 places, it's not that common among the general population).
Jane
I'm going to consider the names according to the percentage of each age group they represent, Jane is a good example of how this works.
Year born | Frequency |
1871-81 | 9 |
1861-70 | 4 |
1851-60 | 7 |
1841-50 | 3 |
1831-40 | 8 |
1821-30 | 7 |
1811-20 | 8 |
1801-10 | 2 |
The most number of Janes was born in 1871-81, but that only represents 4% of all women born 1871-81. The 8 Janes born 1811-20 represents 13% of all women. Graph:
Posted by Sarah Francis at 6:24 pm 0 comments
Monday, April 22, 2013
Ellen Factsheet
Meaning
Greek via Medieval English - possibly 'torch'
England and Wales statistics
Anglo-Saxon record: no entries
13th century: no entries
Earliest birth record: Ellen Smith (b. 1510)
1550-1690: High: #12 (1550); Low: no entries (1660-80); fairly stable at #17 then decline
1840-1905: High: #7 (1850, 1860); Low: #20 (1905); stable with decline at end of period
1914-1994: High: #24 (1914); Low: no entries (1944-84); decline with reemergence at end of period
2004: #124
2008: #210
2011: #258 (189 births)
US statistics
1880-2011: High: #59 (1884, 1946); Low: #699 (2009, 2011); slight decline, slight rise, slow decline
2011: #699 (395 births)
Posted by Sarah Francis at 12:00 pm 0 comments
Sunday, April 21, 2013
Research Sunday: Names in Workhouses of the 1881 census
Rank | Rank compared with 1881 census total | Name | Workhouses Count | % | % compared with 1881 census total |
1 | = | William | 346 | 17.35 | +4 |
2 | = | John | 289 | 14.49 | +2.1 |
3 | = | Thomas | 171 | 8.58 | +0.7 |
4 | +1 | James | 155 | 7.77 | +1.2 |
5 | -1 | George | 139 | 6.97 | 0 |
6 | = | Henry | 120 | 6.02 | +1.4 |
7 | = | Charles | 93 | 4.66 | +0.6 |
8 | = | Joseph | 73 | 3.66 | +0.3 |
9 | +1 | Edward | 55 | 2.76 | +0.2 |
10 | +1 | Frederick | 54 | 2.71 | +0.3 |
11 | -1 | Robert | 48 | 2.41 | -0.3 |
12 | +3 | Samuel | 46 | 2.31 | +0.5 |
13 | = | Richard | 41 | 2.06 | +0.1 |
14 | -2 | Alfred | 34 | 1.71 | -0.3 |
15 | +11 | Daniel | 27 | 1.35 | +0.9 |
16 | +8 | Benjamin | 25 | 1.25 | +0.6 |
17 | = | Albert | 22 | 1.10 | -0.2 |
18 | -4 | Arthur | 20 | 1.00 | -0.9 |
19 | -1 | David | 16 | 0.80 | -0.3 |
20 | -4 | Walter | 14 | 0.70 | -0.7 |
Rank | Rank compared with 1881 census total | Name | Workhouses Count | % | % compared with 1881 census total |
1 | = | Mary | 321 | 16.10 | +3.1 |
2 | = | Elizabeth | 211 | 10.58 | +2.3 |
3 | +1 | Sarah | 162 | 8.12 | +1.7 |
4 | -1 | Ann | 153 | 7.67 | +1.1 |
5 | = | Jane | 79 | 3.96 | -0.7 |
6 | = | Ellen | 79 | 3.96 | +0.9 |
7 | = | Eliza | 71 | 3.56 | +0.8 |
8 | +3 | Margaret | 53 | 2.66 | +0.3 |
9 | +1 | Emma | 51 | 2.56 | -0.1 |
10 | +7 | Catherine | 49 | 2.46 | +1.3 |
11 | +4 | Louisa | 42 | 2.11 | +0.8 |
12 | -4 | Alice | 41 | 2.06 | -0.7 |
13 | +11 | Caroline | 40 | 2.01 | +1.1 |
14 | -1 | Hannah | 34 | 1.71 | -0.3 |
15 | +2 | Maria | 33 | 1.65 | +0.4 |
16 | +15 | Susan | 32 | 1.60 | +1 |
17 | -5 | Emily | 28 | 1.40 | -0.7 |
18 | +2 | Charlotte | 27 | 1.35 | +0.3 |
19 | +10 | Frances | 27 | 1.35 | +0.7 |
20 | -2 | Harriet | 26 | 1.30 | +0.1 |
Posted by Sarah Francis at 12:11 pm 0 comments
Labels: 1880, 1881 census, 19th century, graphs, historical names, most popular, popular, popular names, research, statistics, trends, uk, Victorian